Обязательные навыки
The skills the role marked as non-negotiable, matched against your profile one by one.
WeightingA hard floor — below a third of them, the total is capped no matter how well everything else scores.Aria works around the clock, reading every new opening against your profile and showing you exactly which factors landed and which didn't — so you apply with evidence, not blind hope.
Aria reads the whole profile — skills and the level against each, seniority, language, location, the band you need — instead of sweeping a CV for keywords, and shows you exactly where you stand before you spend an evening applying.
Skills with an honest level against each, the cities you'd work in, and the salary you actually need. Ten minutes, once — you never retype it per application.
Every published role is scored against that profile on six factors, and the ones worth your evening arrive with the reasoning already attached.
You see which factors landed and which didn't before you open the form — and every application you send carries a live status afterwards.
This is a match as it opens: the role, every factor Aria checked with the sentence that explains it, and a written note at the end. Nothing hidden behind a percentage — and every match is built the same way, in the same order, so once you have read one you can read all of them at a glance.
This one's worth your evening. Every required skill lands, and five years clears a band written for four-plus. Hybrid in Dushanbe matches what you asked for. The one soft spot is pay — you are near the top of their range, so open with it. The Kubernetes gap is nice-to-have, not a blocker.
No stage of this is hidden from you — that is the whole point of the product.
Skills with a level against each, languages, location, the salary you need, and whether you'll relocate. It takes about ten minutes and you never repeat it.
Aria scores your profile against every published role on six factors. The scorer is deterministic — the same profile against the same role gives the same numbers every time.
Each match opens with the factors that landed and the ones that didn't. A missing required skill is named, not buried inside a percentage — which turns a rejection you'd never have understood into a to-do list.
Asked for on three of your matches this week. Nice-to-have on two of them, required on one — so it is costing you exactly one role, and you can see which.
Submitted, screening, shortlisted, interviewing, offer. Every application carries a status. No silence, and no automated rejection — a person makes that call.
Every one of these is shown to you per match, with a sentence explaining it.
The skills the role marked as non-negotiable, matched against your profile one by one.
WeightingA hard floor — below a third of them, the total is capped no matter how well everything else scores.The secondary set, kept separate from required so you always know which gap actually blocks you.
WeightingLifts a score, never rescues one.Years and scope against the band the role was written for.
WeightingBoth under- and over-shooting cost you — a role you would leave in six months is not a match.City, the hybrid or remote policy, and whether you said you'd relocate.
WeightingRemote roles score this flat for everyone.The languages you work in against the ones the team actually runs on.
WeightingRussian, Tajik, Uzbek, Kazakh, English.What you said you need against the band the employer posted.
WeightingShown to you before you apply, not at the final stage.Skill matching runs off an explicit alias
table, not fuzzy string distance. Edit distance pairs java with
javascript, which is exactly what makes an automated shortlist untrustworthy.
Anything that scores people has to be able to say what it refuses to do with the score.
Aria ranks and recommends; every verdict waits for a person. The queue is ordered, not decided.
Employers can search the pool, but results carry no name and no contact details. Your identity appears once you apply.
You get the factors and the reasoning, never a score for yourself — a number would just teach everyone to write a CV at the scorer.
A board hands you every posting that shares a word with your CV and then goes quiet. Aria scores each role against your profile and shows the working before you spend the evening on it.
|
|
A job board Keyword in, everything out | |
|---|---|---|
| Roles you're shown | The ones scored against your profile | Everything a keyword matched |
| Before you apply, you know | Which factors landed and which didn't | The advert |
| Match transparency | Every factor explained | |
| How skills are matched | An explicit alias table | Text search over a pasted CV |
| Зарплата | Shown up front, before you apply | Often not posted at all |
| After you apply | A live status at every stage | Usually silence |
| Who makes the call | A person, every time | Whatever the filter decides |
They see their own ranking of applicants to their own role, with the reasoning attached. You are never shown a number for yourself — telling someone “you scored 41, recommend reject” before a human has looked is indefensible, and it hands anyone a scoring oracle to tune a CV against.
Employers can search the pool, but search results carry no name and no contact details — only the signal needed to judge fit. Your identity appears once you apply and connect the two sides.
No. Aria ranks and recommends; every verdict waits for a person. The queue is ordered, not decided.
Add it in your own words. Matching runs off an explicit alias table, so postgres and PostgreSQL are the same skill — but a name nothing recognises is still worth writing down, because a person reads the profile too.
Nothing, ever, for jobseekers. Employers pay for the hiring side.
Free, always, for jobseekers.